We Need More Censorship
17 February 2022 - 7:45 pm
As time goes by and the evidence mounts up that the COVID scam is just that, and the “vaccines” are not just ineffective as far as protecting people but actively harmful, naturally instead of Governments and public health “experts” admitting they were wrong, we just get more censorship.
On the 17th February 2022 on Yahoo News an article was published titled:
“Covid data will not be published over concerns it’s misrepresented by anti-vaxxers”
Yes you read that right. Raw data regarding the numbers and vaccination status of people and hospital admissions allegedly for COVID-19 will not be published anymore.
The concern that the main claim regarding the effectiveness of these so-called vaccines, which is evidently false when looking at the data showing proportions of people ill and hospitalised with what is being diagnosed as COVID-19, comparing the “vaccinated” and “unvaccinated”, will be “misrepresented by anti-vaxxers”.
Initially the way they just hand-waved this evidence away was to say that as there are more jabbed than unjabbed, of course there would be more people hospitalised with it, and the old chestnut which is “if 100% of people were jabbed, then 100% of hospitalisations would be jabbed people”, because you know, “no vaccine is 100% effective”.
This is why such a determined effort has been made to eradicate the control group in this global experiment. The control group is the unjabbed, and while there is a significant number it is easy to compare health outcomes of each group when that data is published. As the numbers fall more and more in the direction of tragedy, i.e. the jabbed are having more health issues, and the main health issue getting all the attention because the media has spent two years blaring it from the rooftops daily, is COVID cases, hospitalisations and deaths.
Those numbers served a purpose to scare people initially into believing COVID-19 was a serious and deadly virus that was going to kill millions of people including the perfectly healthy, and so lockdowns were needed and our only hope was the Holy Vaccines.
As the rollout of the vaccines began late 2020 and early 2021 and we went through summer, it appeared as though the vaccines were a roaring success, and then as autumn and winter arrived, so did Omicron to excuse the failure of the jabs. Now we’re heading back out of winter and after multiple jabs people’s health is measurably worse they will have a hard time keeping the illusion going, especially as the control group, i.e. the “unvaccinated” still exist. That’s a real problem for the Government and those “public health experts”, as the continued publication of basic data regarding vaccination status associated with hospital admissions for the COVIDs will evidence the stark difference in the percentages of each group that is (and has been for some considerable time) proof these jabs are worse than useless at the job they were advertised as doing.
The Yahoo article says Public Health Scotland will:
…stop publishing data on covid deaths and hospitalisations by vaccination status – over concerns it is misrepresented by anti-vaxx campaigners.https://uk.news.yahoo.com/covid-data-stop-being-published-114056378.html
Instead, officials will focus on publishing more robust and complex vaccine effectiveness data.
Yes, what we need is “more robust and complex vaccine effectiveness data”, because with complexity comes obfuscation. By “robust” they just mean something that isn’t going to come back and bite them, like the actual data.
Typical of appalling modern journalism, the statement:
Officials said two issues relating to the unvaccinated population and testing habits meant the data was no longer robust and open for misinterpretation without context.
…was followed by an explanation of only one issue. Something about the population data they use is GP registration data and some people registered with Scottish GPs may not live in Scotland, and that will skew the figures as the number of unjabbed gets smaller and smaller. They don’t identify any other issue than the fact that this data is now highly inconvenient.
The issue regarding the GP registration data seems like it could be easily dealt with as no-one is usually permitted to be registered with a GP without a home address and so non-Scottish addresses could be easily filtered. It seems as this is just something they conjured up to be able to write about an “issue”. A PHS official is quoted as saying:
The case rates, hospitalisation rates, the death rates are very simple statistics, whereas for the vaccine effectiveness studies we use modelling, we compare people who have tested negative to those who have tested positive and match them on their underlining co-morbidities.
Oh yes, “modelling”. In other words, complete fiction. And all of a sudden “underlining co-morbidities” are highly relevant, when for two full years regarding deaths attributed to COVID-19, AKA “death within 28 days of a positive test” the mention of co-morbidities was censored as “medical misinformation”.
For some examples of just how accurate “modelling” has been throughout the COVID Show see this article and this one. Does anyone remember the headlines about SAGE “pleading” with the Government to lock everything down over Christmas just gone because Neil Ferguson and his “models” predicted 5,000 deaths a day from Omicron if they didn’t? Yes he did actually say that. Of course even though we didn’t end up locked down, that never happened. Even in the depths of winter, it never happened.
When it comes to public health and “modelling”, it is really just a euphemism for having no actual evidence, or the actual evidence says something we don’t like, so we’re going to use a “computer model” to give us the answer we want.
And here we are again. Now the hospitalisations/vaccine status data is a problem for them, now the evidence is blatantly clear that the jabs don’t prevent any of the things they claim it does, we just get what you’d expect from a tyrannical, authoritarian Government… more censorship.