15 February 2022 - 11:50 am
The alleged purpose of patents is to give its owner the legal right to exclude others from making, using, or selling an invention for a limited period of time in exchange for publishing an enabling disclosure of the invention, according to Wikipedia.
The idea is that by inventing something you are bringing something of benefit, either physical or intellectual to the table of humanity and your efforts should be recognised and (for a time) protected. In the United States they have the Patent Act. In the text of that, in 35 U.S.C. Section 101 it states:
Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title.35 U.S.C. § 101 – https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/101_step1_refresher.pdf
In 2013 there was a legal dispute between the Association for Molecular Pathology and Myriad Genetics, Inc. An extract from the syllabus of the case explains:
The Patent Act permits patents to be issued to “[w]hoever invents or discovers any new and useful . . . composition of matter,” §101, but “laws of nature, natural phenomena, and abstract ideas” “ ‘are basic tools of scientific and technological work’ ” that lie beyond the domain of patent protection, Mayo, supra, at ___. The rule against patents on naturally occurring things has limits, however. Patent protection strikes a delicate balance between creating “incentives that lead to creation, invention, and discovery” and “imped[ing] the flow of information that might permit, indeed spur, invention.” Id., at ___. This standard is used to determine whether Myriad’s patents claim a “new and useful . . . composition of matter,” §101, or claim naturally occurring phenomena.https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/569/576/
The US Court had ruled that without this exception there would be considerable danger in granting of patents for naturally occurring things, these “basic tools” as it would be likely to inhibit future innovation based on them, which is not what the patent system is ostensibly intended to achieve. In the words of Justice Thomas who delivered the opinion of the Court in this case, this view is a “long held” one, or in other words this is hardly news. One could legitimately question the validity of patent laws in their entirety seeing as we see them abused routinely in all kinds of fields, not just medical, but let’s cut them some slack for the purposes of this examination and take the purpose of patent registration and enforcement at face value.
So as we can see, back in 2013 the U.S. Supreme Court considered it a long-standing legal position that one cannot patent nature. Simply identifying or isolating something in nature does not mean it can be patented. This includes DNA which is what the Association for Molecular Pathology vs Myriad Genetics Inc case was about. The claim by Myriad Genetics that they had isolated a specific gene they attributed as the cause of breast cancer and subsequent patent meant no-one else could work on finding a cure or treatment without infringing their patent. As this is counter to the public interest and clearly a case of patenting nature itself, the Supreme Court overruled the patent.
Why is this case important? Well abusing the patent system and laws is a common feature in the medical profession, especially in virology and genetic research, especially when there is a lot of money at stake, unsurprisingly. As it turns out, the CDC, NIH and NIAID are all guilty of this kind of thing. Surprise! Government departments break laws to enrich administrators and connected corporations, whoever would have thought it?
For example, the CDC filed a patent application (US7220852B1) on April 25, 2003 for a “newly isolated human coronavirus (SARS-CoV), the causative agent of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)” although the evidence supporting the causal aspect of this claim was unsurprisingly absent.
If we are to believe SARS-CoV was naturally occurring, a zoonotic virus that had magically jumped species from animal to human, this patent is clearly illegal according to U.S. Patent law 35 U.S.C. § 101. As an illegal patent the CDC not only insisted it be granted after being rejected twice, but they carried on paying maintenance fees on their patent even after the 2013 Supreme Court ruling confirmed such a patent was illegal. Interestingly they stopped paying the maintenance fees in 2019, almost like they knew the sequel would be better.
The CDC patents were also rejected initially before they bulldozed it through, for ineligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 102 for being publicly disclosed prior to their own filing. As it turns out the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) stated in their non-final rejection dated 7th September 2005 that the genome submitted by the CDC was published in four Genbank entries in April 2003 ranging from 96.8% to 99.9% identical sequences.
The CDC patent also included several methods of detecting their SARS-CoV “virus” including RT-PCR (Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction) which has the useful (for them) effect of stopping anyone not licensed or part of their collective interest groups from legally being able to independently verify any aspect of this, including whether they’d actually isolated a virus, whether it caused any disease or any potential treatments if it did.
It should not need explaining just how massively open to exploitation that scenario is, and anyone thinking that as it’s a Government department there is no chance of corruption or exploitation should take a quick look at the very mainstream Wikipedia entry on unethical medical experimentation in the U.S. for an introductory eye-opener.
So the CDC registered an illegal patent, petitioned to override the rejection based on two foundational aspects of patent law and then had the temerity to lie in a public statement reported by AP News on the 6th May 2003 that they wanted to control the patent so it would “prevent folks from controlling the technology” and “to give the industry and other researchers reasonable access to the samples”. This statement is so utterly ridiculous and clearly false, proven so by the fact it was in the public domain on Genbank which was one of the reasons the patent was illegal, confirmed by the rejection based on 35 U.S.C. § 102 that the CDC engaged paid-for legal processes to have overridden.
America’s Doctor Anthony Fauci has been in his job at National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984 and involved with U.S. public health for half a century. During that time Americans have seen their health directly related to the job NIAID is tasked with plummet by almost every metric.
On 16th November 2016 it was reported by NBC News that the “United States Comes in Last Again on Health, Compared to Other Countries”. NIAID’s core responsibility it to improve the health of the American people who pay taxes to fund the exorbitant funding demands. Just how much money has been spent on “public health” by the NIH since the installation of one Anthony Fauci? Around $850 billion dollars, give or take according to the appropriations history records.
And what does the NIH and NIAID have to show for over three quarters of a trillion dollars spent over 4 decades? Chronic health problems afflicting children are up from 12.8% in 1994 to 26.6% in 2006 according to this 2010 study.
Since the early 1980s Anthony Fauci has also built up a powerful strategic network to manage almost every aspect of taxpayer funded “public health” in the United States by having allies in all the right places and acting as the advisor to multiple U.S. Presidents on how to keep their public image clean by funding his pet pharma projects, often in the name of helping poor Africans. His connections to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Clinton Foundation, the Wellcome Trust as well as the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Health and Human Services (HHS) agencies, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Pentagon, the White House, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations (UN) organizations all give him an astonishing level of influence. Not to mention the billions of dollars in federal and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) money he can spend on grants and funding his favored researchers, plus the carefully crafted status as America’s premier health expert and friends in media to ensure that facade remains in place.
Fauci launched his career as the U.S. pharma kingpin by allowing Burroughs Wellcome (a pharma company that merged to become Glaxo Wellcome in 1995 and then merged with SmithKline Beecham in 2000 to become GlaxoSmithKline) to be able to charge $10,000 per year for the “First AIDS drug”, the toxic AZT (Azidothymidine) that has probably killed more AIDS patients than AIDS despite it costing cents per dose. That sweetheart deal given State approval by Fauci back in the 1980s set him on the road to stardom in the field of pharma sales and lobbying under the guise of U.S. public health.
Side note: The Wellcome Trust is a pseudo-charity similar to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, in that it supports globalist interests, vaccines and all kinds of other futuristic horror stories. Check out their “First 1000 Days” project to get an idea of the Brave New World style dystopian scenarios they have planned. The Wellcome Trust is the charity/philanthropy arm of GSK, although these days it is important to recognize that this “philanthropy” masquerading as altruistic charity is simply the best PR money can buy for businesses that are so predatory and devoid of ethics that standard marketing simply doesn’t cut it. Not that these Trusts and Foundations are any less predatory, but the charity status and the “non-profit” badge buys them more public credulity and media friendly headlines than any other form of advertising.
Things have improved dramatically if you are a pharmaceutical company, one of Fauci’s “principal investigators” or indeed Anthony Fauci. They have not improved for the rest of the world, or indeed the U.S. public taxpayers.
Way back in 1991 General Colin Powell was quoted as saying “I’m running out of demons, I’m running out of villains. I’m down to (Fidel) Castro and Kim Il Sung”. The article containing the quote suggests Powell had in mind to scale back the U.S. military budget as there was virtually no enemies left and the colossal budget was unnecessary. We can imagine how the real warmongers, those that bemoaned the ending of the “cold war” and disliked the idea of less conflict as it was bad for business, would have felt at hearing this kind of news. We’re talking about the kinds of people who love the idea of wars. They are never happier than when sitting in comfortable, secure war-rooms pushing plastic soldiers and tanks around a model battlefield, while real people are out there getting their limbs blown off, or worse. This was a pending catastrophe for them. They’d be out of the job they love, and their friends at the various military contracting companies who’s sole reason for existence is to monetize the creation of instruments of death and destruction might feel the pinch. We’re talking about someone like Colonel Dr Robert Kadlec, Biodefence Programmes Director at the Department of Homeland Security.
A document titled “Battlefield of the Future” first produced in 1995 with a section written by Robert Kadlec titled “Twenty-First Century Germ Warfare” contains the following…
Using biological weapons under the cover of an endemic or natural disease occurrence provides anRobert Kadlec – https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/CSDS/Books/battlefield_future2.pdf
attacker the potential for plausible denial. In this context, biological weapons offers greater possibilities for use than do nuclear weapons.
Whether Kadlec is a paranoid product of the U.S. military or a cheerleader for disguising biological weapon research as a defense against the allegedly dastardly Russians/Chinese/Muslims etc. (delete as appropriate) is possibly up for debate. Regardless of which you or I decide he is, he has pushed war-gaming all kinds of bio-security threats including in the lead up to the COVID pseudo-pandemic.
In 2017 Kadlec was given the job of Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), an office within Health and Human Services and within months he was testifying to the U.S. Congress that the U.S. was dangerously unprepared for a pandemic. This is reported on the Wikipedia article on Kadlec. Interestingly Wikipedia attempts to create a false dichotomy of two opposing sides over an apparent disagreement in 2020, Robert Kadlec on one side and Rick Bright of BARDA and “we need an entity of excitement” fame. They may have been on opposing sides over some petty political nonsense, but they are both firmly on the side of Brave New World style fear-driven “vaccines” for everything being the future they want to see. There is never any shortage of theatre.
In every single war-gamed germ driven simulation event that has taken place over the last 20+ years, none of them ever prioritise actual public health. If you look at the various “scenarios” and tabletop exercises over the years such as:
- Dark Winter (2001)
- Atlantic Storm (2005)
- Scenario For The Future of Technology And International Development (2012)
- SPARS Pandemic Scenario (2017)
- Crimson Contagion (2019)
- Event 201 (2019)
- plus other events and meetings listed on the Center for Health Security website
…the various authorities, agencies and well-placed officials are primed to fixate on only one aspect, that being greater authority and force by Governments to monitor and censor information that is not considered authoritative and push vaccines as the only solution. Nothing about the public keeping healthy by avoiding toxins, keeping fit and healthy, ensuring vitamin D and C levels are up and early interventions with cheap, repurposed and well established safe and effective medicines. Nope, just boots on faces and needles in arms. That alone should tell you everything you need to know about the “pandemic preparedness responses” that have been rehearsed and honed over decades to enable the overwhelming global authoritarianism that appeared to emerge spontaneously in early 2020.
In the section of the “Battlefield of the Future” book written by Kadlec he lists the bio-weapons that were produced by the United States during the years 1954 to 1969…
We are supposed to believe they don’t do things like that anymore. Everything now is purely research for defensive capabilities. That book was produced during the 1990s and it wasn’t long before there was an anthrax scare. After a small group of men allegedly hijacked some planes and flew around over the most heavily defended airspace in the world for a while before knocking down 3 buildings with 2 planes and conveniently crashed a third plane into the finance department of the Pentagon where the disappearance of $2.3 trillion was being investigated, announced the day before, the 10th September 2001 by Donald Rumsfeld, there was another false-flag event regarding anthrax being mailed to several U.S. politicians.
The recipients of those anthrax-laced letters were Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy and Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle. It just so happened that both of those people were attempting to slow the progress of the signing into law of the USA PATRIOT Act (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism). It was signed into law on the 26th October 2001, after being submitted to Congress by the Bush Administration on 24th September, a mere 13 days after the “attack” on the twin-towers. An impressive feat to get all that legislation written up, organised, checked and legally verified in less than two weeks. Almost like it was just sitting there waiting for an event to happen for it to seem like it was needed.
As it turned out, rather than being crazy Islamic terrorists sending badly written letters…
…the entire thing appears to have emanated from a U.S. military laboratory in Fort Detrick, and a U.S. scientist being the main suspect as reported by the Guardian in February 2002. Unsurprisingly the story appears to end there… shocker.
After that obviously false-flag anthrax scare in 2001 which was a precursor to the now burgeoning bio-security grid being built around us, and after the 2003 illegal patenting of SARS-CoV by the CDC along with all the methods of detection, by 2005 Anthony Fauci was hyping up the potential for SARS to be used as some kind of bio-terrorism weapon. He had announced that his organisation NIAID was funding research for various SARS related tech and pharmaceutical ventures including two vaccines focused on the SARS-CoV spike protein.
Much of this research was conducted outside the U.S. using the connections provided by Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance, mostly in the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Chinese Academy of Sciences. This is evidenced by the National Institutes of Health grant R01AI110964. The “gain of function” champion Ralph Baric, along with NAIAD and Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance worked on coronavirus components with the specific aim to increase their negative health impacts on humans.
Daszak was interviewed by Vincent Racaniello in May 2020 where they discussed various aspects of the work EcoHealth Alliance does. The full interview is here on YouTube, but here is an interesting excerpt…
Imagine spending millions of dollars and “6 or 7 years” dredging the furthest flung areas of China and then thousands of hours in labs to be able to identify “a clear and present danger”. This is like the overzealous health and safety inspector who spends days taking a factory apart and eventually identifies a dropped staple that ended up under the floorboards and claiming that it was a huge risk to employees safety. Daszak’s claim that their strategy is to identify pandemic causing pathogens and their locations to enable the world to be better prepared is laughable considering the decade or more he and his associated virus-mongers have been working away, non-profit of course, and we then live through 2+ years of the most farcical yet authoritarian clown show based on a “virus” that poses virtually no risk to anyone.
As it turns out Peter Daszak is something of a regular on TWIV, or This Week in Virology for the uninitiated. In June 2020 he was back discussing the “work of EcoHealth Alliance in surveillance of bats in China for SARS-related coronaviruses”, all in the name of saving humanity from “future pandemics”. It would appear humanity would be much better off without the help of these lunatics who think harvesting genetic material from obscure areas of nature and amplifying their pathogenic capabilities beyond all recognition is somehow a benefit to humans.
By 2013 the Wuhan Institute of Virology had outlined the importance of the S1 spike protein and the ACE II receptors as being high risk for a severe response in humans.
Throughout all of this, and the subsequent development of mRNA based medical products being sold to the public as “vaccines” the S1 spike protein is the key aspect. All the efforts to manipulate so-called “coronaviruses” revolves around the S1 protein. The single main aspect of it affecting human health is the S1 protein. And the one component of the SARS-CoV-2 virus they chose to have the mRNA injections instruct the recipient’s cells to generate is the S1 spike protein.
The claimed “novel” aspect of this particular coronavirus is the S1 spike protein, as according to Peter Daszak, that is what drives all the behaviour. The problem with the claim that this is “novel” is that the patent on it has existed for almost 20 years, and as the attempted rejections that were bulldozed through by the CDC based on the upwards of 96.8% similarity any claim that some tiny variations that could even be attributed to sequencing errors (a known problem) is somehow “novel” or new, is as ridiculous as someone taking a song, altering less than 4% of the notes and claiming it is a new song.
Out of a genome approximately 30,000 base-pairs long, they chose the S1 part to have people’s cells replicate.
The spike protein (the S part in the above image) makes up approximately 13% of the entire genome. They don’t test for in with any of the COVID-19 tests, including RT-PCR. Those orange sections in the above image are the sections they can test for, and they don’t test for all three. The S1 spike protein is allegedly the single novel aspect of this coronavirus. This S protein has somehow gone from enabling coronaviruses to be one of the causes of the common cold, a basic respiratory ailment 99.99% of people shake off without any major problems, to causing an almost infinite list of symptoms and damage attributed to it by State Science including heart failure, multiple organ failure, blood clotting and long-term chronic health problems.
It would appear CERN who were looking for the “God particle” have been barking up the wrong tree. They should pivot from their investigations of the Higgs boson and turn their attention to this spike protein as it has somehow gone from virtually harmless to capable of major internal organ damage, all while most people have no symptoms at all… amazing.
Here’s the thing. It is clear from all the data and two full years of evidence, that the fear-mongering around the respiratory ailment known as COVID-19 was hyped more than any other alleged illness in history. The single main motivation for that was to get the public to accept without question a “novel” technology for a “novel” virus. There are other goals it is possible to discuss and evidence, but the so-called vaccines are something all the other things depend on.
One of the main arguments for mRNA “vaccines” is part of the literature in some of the patents, including Moderna’s Patent number US10702600B1 that was provisionally applied for on 22nd October 2015. This was Moderna’s pivot to SARS-like coronaviruses as a main target for their mRNA products, and the argument is that it avoids certain problems that “traditional vaccines” can cause…
While not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the RNA (e.g., mRNA) vaccines, as mRNA polynucleotides, are better designed to produce the appropriate protein conformation upon translation as the RNA (e.g., mRNA) vaccines co-opt natural cellular machinery. Unlike traditional vaccines, which are manufactured ex vivo and may trigger unwanted cellular responses, RNA (e.g., mRNA) vaccines are presented to the cellular system in a more native fashion.https://patents.google.com/patent/US10702600B1/en
It all depends on what you call an “unwanted cellular response” of course. Having your own cells produce a pathogen for you own immune system to attack sounds very much like an autoimmune disease. Wikipedia defines autoimmune disease as:
An autoimmune disease is a condition arising from an abnormal immune response to a functioning body part. There are at least 80 types of autoimmune diseases. Nearly any body part can be involved. Common symptoms include low grade fever and feeling tired. Often symptoms come and go.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autoimmune_disease
I am by no means making the case for or against “traditional vaccines”, and “unwanted cellular response” is a real problem despite most people not wanting to believe it, and the medical profession and the Government/pharmaceutical interests claiming it doesn’t exist as all vaccines are “safe and effective” (which makes the implicit admission by Moderna in their patent that harm IS caused very revealing). The main point here is that the solution to the problem of injecting actual pathogens, albeit “dead” or attenuated in some way, is to have your own body produce the pathogen via a “more native” delivery system.
The overlap with the main claimed symptoms of COVID-19, especially the longer-term ones and the effects of autoimmune disease should be noted. As we know there are no long-term studies on how this could potentially affect people injected with it. We do know that the spike protein has been the subject of an intense, well-funded and lengthy attempt to increase how badly it can affect humans, and that spike protein is the very thing that all the mRNA injections from Pfizer, J&J and Moderna instruct recipient’s cells to manufacture.
There is another problem for Moderna related to their patents. According to U.S. patent law, specifically 35 U.S.C. §202 (c)(6) which states that there is…
An obligation on the part of the contractor, in the event a United States patent application is filed by or on its behalf or by any assignee of the contractor, to include within the specification of such application and any patent issuing thereon, a statement specifying that the invention was made with Government support and that the Government has certain rights in the invention.35 U.S.C. §202 (c)(6) – https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/35/202
There appears to be no mention of Government support in the Moderna patent US10702600B1, but as can be seen in this published paper titled “Development of mRNA Vaccines: Scientific and Regulatory Issues” if you look at tables 1 and 2 you’ll see Moderna listed as having collaborated with DARPA, BARDA and NIAID which last time I checked were Government institutions. There is also this clinical trial listed that Moderna were involved in that shows the following details:
W911NF-13-1-0417 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA))
This involves the lipid nanoparticles that Moderna use in their COVID-19 injection. Those lipid nanoparticles were the subject of an attempt by Moderna to get an existing patent invalidated back in 2021. This case, “2020-2329 – Modernatx Inc Fka Moderna Therapeutics Inc v. Arbutus Biopharma Corporation” was eventually decided on the 1st December 2021 and was originally filed on the 25th September 2020, just a few months before Moderna’s first ever product was approved for emergency use in December 2020. We can imagine Moderna didn’t want to have to pay any license fees to use the lipid nanoparticles in it’s mRNA product and so tried to have the patent owned by Arbutus Biopharma Corporation removed. They failed on all counts as you can see from the decision document.
It would be reasonable to assume that as the truth about the damage these injections are causing comes out, the difficulty the Governments and their partners in media, tech and academia are having in silencing outspoken and highly qualified critics of this harmful (and indeed in some cases deadly) global experiment is why Moderna’s share prices are tanking and the CEO, Stéphane Bancel is selling off millions of dollars of shares and has deleted his Twitter account.
On 14th February 2022 this highly conflicted, but nonetheless considered authoritative website attempted to explain “Why Pfizer, BioNTech, Moderna, and Novavax Stocks Are Sliding Today”. After noting that Stéphane Bancel had sold off shares and deleted his Twitter account last week, they attempt to play that off with the line “Bancel has been selling some of his stock on a regular basis for months”. This is indeed true, he has been gifting himself tens of thousands of company shares and selling them off for a long time, as you can see on the Yahoo Finance section for Moderna and looking at “Insider Transactions”.
As it happens Bancel is not the only one selling off shares. The company’s Chief Technology Office Juan Andres and the company President Stephen Hoge have also been selling off shares.
On the 5th September 2021 the Moderna share price hit an all time high of $449.38, and since the 13th September 2021 the following has happened:
- Stéphane Bancel has gifted himself 218,000 shares at zero cost
- Collectively Bancel, Andres and Hoge have sold off 1,021,531 shares valued at a total of $293,922,544
- The share price for Moderna has gone from the ATH of $449.38 down to $159.47 as of now, the time of writing this
Moderna is potentially facing all kinds of problems, and the precipitous drop in share prices as three top company guys shift millions of dollars worth of shares could be a way of protecting that money should the worst happen and the company ends up in serious trouble. In the event of any major legal challenge to either the safety of their products, more specifically the lack of it, or some issues around the laws broken with their patents, or indeed a challenge to the use of lipid nanoparticles in their mRNA injections that may end up being contested by other patent-owning companies, the Moderna shares would end up worthless. Standard practice for corporate grifters looking to cash in on prior knowledge is to get out while the going is still good.
Maybe nothing will come of this and they will shrug off the fact they’ve broken the law and are responsible for untold harms. They are after all backed by the U.S. Government’s most corrupt and evil entities, DARPA, BARDA and NIAID.
Time will tell.