Do No Harm
18 June 2021 - 12:15 pm
If there is anyone who still believes that taking an experimental injection outweighs the risk of catching and possibly dying from COVID-19, here are some official Government figures, and some studies and examples of how some of those Government figures (adverse reactions/deaths due to “vaccines”) are going to be underreported.
There are 3 brands of injection being pushed onto the UK population currently, obviously with more to come as other big pharmaceutical companies scramble to come up with their own concoctions to join the party with. We have Pfizer/BioNTech, AstraZeneca and Moderna.
The Yellow Card System that we have in the UK is the equivalent to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System also known as VAERS in the United States. It works in a similar way in that it is medical people adding the reports to these systems, they are not just open forums for the public to add their own reports to.
The UK Government produces a weekly tabulated summary document for each of the three brands that includes all reported adverse reactions up to the report run date. Before we look at those reports it is important to acknowledge that these systems suffer from a large amount of underreporting. There are not many studies that look at this as it’s not politically advantageous for academia to potentially bite the hand that feeds, be that the State, the pharmaceutical industry or more often than not, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. But there is one that was done (mirror) some years ago in the US regarding the VAERS system. It found that:
Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of “problem” drugs and vaccines that endanger public health.Page 6 – https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf
“Fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.” and there appears to be no study that shows this has improved at all since 2011 when this study was done. There is no reason to believe or evidence to show that the reporting systems anywhere else that work in a similar way, including the UK would be any different. The underreporting will be motivated by the exact same reasons everywhere, because it is the same interested parties that stand to benefit from this underreporting. The big pharmaceutical companies are multi-national. Their products are used the world over and their influence permeates all Governments and academia. We have money flowing between these pharmaceutical corporations, Governments and Universities where research is conducted, we have employees and ex-employees advising or working for Governments, and Government ministers working for the pharmaceutical corporations.
So, given that the figures we’re about to see are likely in the region of 100 times higher in reality due to this proven underreporting, let’s take a look…
We’ll start with team AstraZeneca/Oxford University’s offering. Here is a link to the current report (mirror). The last page contains the summary that looks like this:
It is a 114 page report with the named illnesses/diseases/reactions listed alphabetically. Obviously “Vascular disorders” is at the end of that alphabetical list and Vasculitis specifically is an interesting one in particular as it is considered rare. So rare in fact that a collection of studies on the prevalence of Vasculitis shows that annual prevalence per million for various types of Vasculitis in the UK max out at about 30. There are not many studies on this as it is so rare, but we can see that in 6 months there has been 113 cases (of which 4 so far have been fatal) of Vasculitis related to the AZ injection. Vasculitis is an extremely debilitating auto-immune disease that is, according to rarediseases.org thought to be caused by “disturbances of the body’s immune system”, and explains that “autoimmune disorders are caused when the body’s natural defenses against “foreign” or invading organisms (e.g., antibodies) begin to attack healthy tissue for unknown reasons.”… hmmmm.
885 deaths, a figure we know will be higher as these are underreported. A shocking, tragic loss, every single one due to active medical intervention. So much for “do no harm”.
Next is the Pfizer/BioNTech entry. Here is a link to the current report (mirror) on the UK Government’s website. The summary on the last page looks like this…
Another 32 cases of vasculitis and 421 deaths, figures we know will be higher due to the politically and financially motivated proven underreporting.
Finally we have the Moderna gene therapy injection. Moderna is the company who’s Chief Marketing Officer boasts they are “hacking the software of life” and who list their “strategic collaborators” on their website as this bunch:
Here is the current report (mirror) on the UK Government’s website for adverse reactions to the Moderna injection. The last page looks like this…
According to the UK Government website, the respective numbers of each brand that have been administered are as:
At this date, an estimated 15.6 million first doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and 24.6 million first doses of the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca had been administered, and around 10.8 million and 17.7 million second doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca respectively. An approximate 0.56 million first doses of the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna have also now been administered.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting
So the total number of people who have had each brand are roughly:
- AstraZeneca/Oxford University: 24,600,000
- Pfizer/BioNTech: 15,600,000
- Moderna: 560,000
This is why the Moderna adverse reactions table and numbers are considerably smaller than the other two.
The usual way these terrible outcomes including over 1,200 deaths are justified are that out of around 40 million a mere 1,200 or so dead people is acceptable. Try asking any of the relatives of those 1,200 if it is acceptable. Or how about acknowledging that evidence, studies and so on have proven that these figures could be 100 times higher?
The medical profession subscribes to what is often known as the “Hippocratic Oath”, which contains lines of text such as “First do no harm”. It has been phrased in other ways like “I will abstain from all intentional wrong-doing and harm” and “Practice two things in your dealings with disease: either help or do not harm the patient”. The notion that so-called preventative medicine such as vaccines have an acceptable amount of deaths attached goes completely against the oath physicians swear to “do no harm”.
The moment the medical profession accepted that their actions leading to a single death was OK, justified by politically and financially motivated statistical games, or even outright lies was the moment the medical profession lost sight of it’s primary purpose, to help, and to not harm anyone.
This isn’t about being an “anti-vaxxer”. This is about whether one feels comfortable about the medical profession, authorised by the State and influenced by multi-billion pound corporations actively killing people and it being justified by a set of mostly faked numbers, generated and promoted by those same influential companies and pushed by their partners in Government, whether that be domestic national Governments or international “Governance” like the UN and WHO, funded by the likes of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation with their stated intent of “vaccine market shaping”.
If the trillions spent on paying the likes of Pfizer and the WHO had been put into treating the actually sick people with tried and tested, cheap and available medication there would have been no loss of life at the hands of lackeys wielding syringes at the behest of psychopathic politicians and business-people who want to hack your “software of life”.