BioNTech and Pfizer vaccine for COVID-19 gets UK Government approval
5 December 2020 - 2:03 pm
Yes, just in time for Xmas it’s here. The UK Government is proud to present to you, The Vaccine.
Yes it has been rushed, even Dr Fauci said that although later in a not very unexpected turn-around said he was very sorry; and yes, it is experimental and using technology that has never before been approved for use on humans.
Don’t worry though, the UK Department of Health and Social Care has had a quick look, and supported by some donations (see here and here) by the seemingly omnipresent Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Health Organisation (who’s largest supporter in the possibly temporary absence of the USA is, you guessed it, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) they’ve decided it can be granted “authorisation for temporary supply”.
This document (mirror) is the Government produced “Information for UK Healthcare Professionals”, where you can see some details about what the vaccine contains, about the trials and efficacy, warnings and precautions.
It explains you need two doses, and that “Individuals may not be protected until at least 7 days after their second dose of the vaccine.” which sounds a tad imprecise for what is allegedly such foundational settled science.
Useful to know, although don’t expect anyone about to administer this to you to mention it, is that “No interaction studies have been performed”, “Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed” and “It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has an impact on fertility”.
While it discusses the “Efficacy against COVID-19 disease” it is interesting to note how they defined “confirmed cases” as part of establishing if this works. It explains:
Confirmed cases were determined by Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) and at least 1 symptom consistent with COVID-19 disease*.Page 8 – https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/941452/Information_for_healthcare_professionals.pdf
*Case definition (at least 1 of): fever, new or increased cough, new or increased shortness of breath; chills, new or increased muscle pain, new loss of taste or smell, sore throat, diarrhoea or vomiting
So the test to check for actual cases is the not-a-test-at-all PCR method invented in 1984 to “rapidly make millions to billions of copies of a specific DNA sample, allowing scientists to take a very small sample of DNA and amplify it to a large enough amount to study in detail” according to Wikipedia, combined with “at least” 1 symptom of almost every ailment known to humanity. Does this sound like actual science to you?
The list of Excipients (which are substances formulated alongside the active ingredients for stabilisation, bulking-up or adding some therapeutic enhancement) is as follows:
- ALC-0315 = (4-hydroxybutyl) azanediyl)bis (hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate)
- ALC-0159 = 2-[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide
- potassium chloride
- potassium dihydrogen phosphate
- sodium chloride
- disodium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate
- water for injections
Apparently none of this should be cause for concern, because the Gates funded MHRA and the UK Government have decreed it.
If you happen to think this all might be an unnecessary risk given the survival rate, even taking into account the inflated death figures, is better than 99.9% then of course you are experiencing “Vaccine Hesitancy” (mirror), a plague considered such a threat by all the usual suspects (The WHO, WEF, Governments (mirror) and global organisations that work for Governments like Ipsos MORI) that the UK Government has, according to The Times, engaged GCHQ (Government Communications Headquarters) to begin an offensive cyber-operation to deal with it.
Yes, the spy agency is using tools that were developed to tackle “disinformation” that was allegedly “peddled by Islamic State”, and are now being repurposed to deal with any websites that they decide are publishing content that can be categorised as “propaganda”. Of course this is claimed to be all about Russia as usual, but that cover will not stop the Government from “tackling false information about inoculation” anywhere they see it as a threat. The State naturally gets to decide what is true and false, and a government source said:
“GCHQ has been told to take out antivaxers online and on social media. There are ways they have used to monitor and disrupt terrorist propaganda.”https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/gchq-in-cyberwar-on-anti-vaccine-propaganda-mcjgjhmb2
If any Americans are feeling left out, please don’t worry as you can be sure the acting director of the Centre for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Dr. Patrizia Cavazzoni will help expedite matters. As a previous member of the Global Health Programs International Advisory Board according to McGill as well as ex Senior Vice President for Development Operations at Pfizer and the ex Pharmaceutical Industry’s representative to the Food and Drug Administration’s Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee she has this all well in hand.
By the way, if the phrase “conflict of interest” happen to come to mind while reading that last paragraph, don’t worry about that either. It will have been looked at by the respective Officials in charge of making sure nothing like that ever happens and they will have decided that there just isn’t anything to be concerned about. Just like the UK Government did when it turned out that Patrick Vallance has £600,000 of shares in GlaxoSmith-Kline who he previously worked for on a salary of £780,000 per year. Nothing to worry about, please pay no attention to that. We’ve decided there’s no conflict of interest.
This is all for your own good. Never mind the off-the-charts levels of corruption, the blatant bribery of Governments by interested parties and the anti-science testing used to justify the systematic removals of what it is to be human to save us all from a bad cold. Just listen, believe and obey.