We live in a corrupted system. The way to tackle corruption is to first acknowledge it exists. Only then is it possible to come up with ways of dealing with it, but don't make the mistake of believing the system can or will uncorrupt itself.

UN Medical Misinformation

The United Nations is the parent organisation of the World Health Organisation and many others including…

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF)
  • World Bank Group
  • UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF)
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO)
  • International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
  • International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)
  • International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)
  • International Labour Organization (ILO)
  • International Maritime Organization (IMO)
  • International Telecommunication Union (ITU)
  • World Trade Organisation (WTO)
  • UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
  • UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO)
  • Universal Postal Union (UPU)
  • World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
  • World Meteorological Organization (WMO)

There is also the United Nations Programme on HIV and AIDS (UNAIDS), Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and a myriad of other programmes, panels, steering groups, councils and so on, each with it’s own governance structure and budget, all falling within the domain of the UN and it’s self-appointed “global” authority.

The whole thing is outlined on the UN website on a page titled “Model United Nations” where the “UN Family of Organisations” is described. The UN’s stated purpose includes the headline “to maintain international peace and security”. Given that there are 193 member states and only 2 non-member (they call them “observer”) states, which are Holy See (which holds sovereignty over Vatican City) and unsurprisingly, Palestine, we can reasonably describe the UN as the de-facto World Government, as it was always intended to be.

The emblem of the United Nations, with an interesting projection of the map of the world, divided up into 33 sections.

Some might object to that description on the grounds that it’s not a proper Government as it doesn’t appear to have the illusion of democracy as part of the process of choosing it’s representatives. In that sense it is much like the EU, where national member Governments put forward their chosen acolytes loyal to the international cause. Others argue this is Governance, not Government, which is not really an argument at all. Still others point to the apparent lack of teeth the UN has in stopping war after war, given their “international peace and security” remit, and therefore they have no real authority and as such cannot be considered a Government.

Clearly the Governance/Government distinction is irrelevant as one simply has to check the definition of Governance to see that…

Governance is the process of interactions through the laws, norms, power or language of an organized society over a social system (family, tribe, formal or informal organization, a territory or across territories). It is done by the government of a state, by a market, or by a network.


So yes, not all Governance is Government, but seeing that the UN is made up of National Governments, can and does create and enforce laws and directs the actions, albeit selectively, of it’s members in a legally binding way, it is a Government by dint of it’s actions.

The fact that there are wars between member states is also no indication that the UN as a whole is not a cohesive singular entity with one-world aspirations. The member nations can be seen as departments within a single company. Even within a national Government, and one political party within that there are often “warring” factions. In political parties and companies there are always rivalries, disagreements and people trying to take out who they see as either opposition, or as obstructions in the way of their own interests. Given these political forums attract the very worst kinds of people in this regard, it should be no surprise that conflicts are a permanent feature, even within the membership of an organisation ostensibly there to promote “peace and security”, and of course that’s just the sales pitch anyway.

The UN is so vast, and it’s history so dubious that volumes could be written about just one single sub-section of it. Here though we are going to look at a document the UN has on it’s website (mirror PDF) published on the 19th May 2021 and titled “The 12 Common Myths & Misconceptions about COVID-19 Vaccination”. Yes, the Official World Authority on Everything is going to clear things up for us. We should expect detailed and scientifically backed explanations that debunk these “common myths” and clear up the “misconceptions”. We will look at the “myths” in order, and their authoritative explanation, and then comment. We will also, for the purposes of this analysis, suspend any views regarding the existence of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 as a diagnosis, and act like the mainstream narrative is true. Are you ready?


Vaccines allow your body to build immunity without the damaging effects the actual diseases can have. COVID-19 can cause serious complications and can be deadly. There are no specific treatments for COVID-19. It is far smarter to avoid the risk. (For more information go to: WHO: How Do Vaccines Work?

Here we have statements that are presented as undisputed fact. We also have “vaccines” presented as having absolutely zero possible downsides. We have the disingenuous statement that there are “no specific treatments for COVID-19” which is only true because they deliberately sabotaged and censored any and all efforts to repurpose pre-existing drugs that had good results in helping people who were ill, that had good safety profiles, were out of patent and therefore were cheap and easy to produce.

The claim that “it is far smarter to avoid the risk” is simply a lie, given the recovery rate for a COVID-19 “case” was over 99%, the average age for a death attributed to COVID-19 was generally as high if not higher than the average lifespan, and that there were known risks attached to these “vaccines” at the time, which is now becoming apparent via reluctantly released trial data, and the extraordinary number of registered adverse reactions and deaths.

In their linked puff piece titled “How do vaccines work?” we are repeatedly told that protection from disease is the outcome of vaccination, including this line…

Vaccinating not only protects yourself, but also protects those in the community who are unable to be vaccinated. If you are able to, get vaccinated.


Now that it’s routinely stated that the COVID-19 vaccines don’t actually stop you catching “it”, and don’t stop you passing “it” on, and those injected multiple times don’t appear to bat an eyelid when they test positive and get ill with what they believe is COVID-19, the above statement is also an outright lie, one that was more than apparent by May 2021.

Worst of all, the response does not actually address the allegedly mythical statement, at all. Just baseless statements and an appeal to intellect and nothing about natural immunity.


COVID-19 vaccines produce protection against the disease, as a result of developing an immune response to the SARS-Cov-2 virus. Developing immunity through vaccination means there is a reduced risk of developing the illness and its consequences. This immunity helps you fight the virus if exposed. Getting vaccinated may also protect people around you, because if you are protected from getting infected and from disease, you are less likely to infect someone else. This is particularly important to protect people at increased risk for severe illness from COVID-19, such as healthcare providers, older or elderly adults, and people with other medical conditions.

This is just a rehash of “Myth” 1, and makes all the same fallacious claims and abuses the word “immunity” in the same way the word “vaccine” has been abused. No normal person said they have “a strong immunity”. They might have said they have a strong immune system. The use of specific words here is no accident. Having an immune system, strong or otherwise does not mean you are immune from all disease and literally no-one ever claimed that. The word “immunity” is defined as:

the quality or state of being immune
especially a condition of being able to resist a particular disease especially through preventing development of a pathogenic microorganism or by counteracting the effects of its products


This aligns with the claim “COVID-19 vaccines produce protection against the disease”, except as we have established, and is now commonly accepted fact, the COVID-19 vaccines DO NOT produce protection, as people still test positive, suffer symptoms and die from what they are told is COVID-19. Being “immune” is not a sliding scale. You are either immune, or you are not. The misleading phrase “developing an immune response” is there to prime an already lied to public to hear what they want to hear. They hear “developing an immune response”, and think “immunity” which then led to the incorrect thinking that they would be “immune”. The media, Governments etc. did nothing to correct this, and in fact used these words and phrases interchangeably to perpetuate the lie. You could inject yourself with dog excrement and your body would “develop an immune response” AKA your body would react via aspects of your immune system to mitigate the foreign materials and toxins. It wouldn’t make you immune to dogshit though.

There are other issues with the UN response such as the faux-distinction between infection and disease, and the suggestion that “healthcare providers” were/are at an increased risk from severe illness from COVID-19. If you have no disease, then you’re not “infected”. Asymptomatic illness is a myth, there is no such thing when talking about respiratory illnesses. And there is no evidence anywhere in the world that healthcare providers have been disproportionately affected by what they are calling COVID-19.


There are strict protections in place to help ensure the safety of all COVID-19 vaccines. Before receiving validation from WHO and national regulatory agencies, COVID-19 vaccines must undergo rigorous testing in clinical trials to prove that they meet internationally agreed benchmarks for safety and effectiveness.
Unprecedented scientific collaborations have allowed COVID-19 vaccine research, development, and authorizations to be completed in record time – to meet the urgent need for COVID-19 vaccines while maintaining high safety standards. As with all vaccines, WHO and regulatory authorities will continuously monitor the use of COVID-19 vaccines to confirm that they remain safe for all who receive them. See information published by the World Health Organization: Vaccine Safety Q&A.

This is a classic. We managed to fit 10+ years of long-term safety and efficacy trials into 9 months because lots of people were working on it. They call it “Unprecedented scientific collaborations”, although there’s not much actual science involved. Lots of “collaboration”, planning and money changing hands, yes. There is little more to be said about the utter nonsense in this response, as if anyone thinks you can actually compress time. We grew a fully mature oak tree in 9 months because we had so many people planting acorns. That’s the level of absurdity we’re at, from the de-facto World Government and their “Science”.


Even if you have already had COVID-19, WHO recommends that individuals be vaccinated. The protection that someone gains from having COVID-19 will vary from person to person, and it is also not known how long natural immunity might last. Those who have previously had COVID-19 infection should still receive COVID-19 vaccination. (Source: WHO Information on COVID-19 Vaccines)

More absurdity here… we don’t know, we don’t know, have the COVID-19 “vaccines” anyway, even though we don’t know. Except they DID know about the harms that these injections would cause and they did know that the absolute risk reduction was less than 1%, even in the fraudulent and manipulated trials.

Interesting that every external link to “source” information so far has been the WHO, which is part of the UN. This is like the author of a paper only referencing himself, or subsidiary groups he is in charge of. Hardly independent but then I suppose when you’ve appointed yourself the world’s authority on everything, there’s no-one else with credentials you could cite that would carry any weight at all.


While the ingredients in the labels of vaccines can look intimidating, they are usually found naturally in the body, the food we eat, and the environment around us – for example, in tuna. The amounts in vaccines are very small. Additionally, vaccines are tested and go through rigorous and lengthy scientific trials as well as certification processes with WHO and national regulatory agencies to ensure that they are safe and effective. (Source PAHO: Debunking Immunization Myths)

Yes, you silly plebs. Just because they are scary sounding, or have long names, don’t you worry about it. Things like mercury are naturally occurring and just because some foods are contaminated with it and it’s already probably in you, it’s fine. This is another ridiculous “debunking”, as it is only referring to things like adjuvants and secondary “ingredients”, not the main active ingredient that instructs the recipient’s own cells to produce a pathogen.

A toxin is defined as:

a poisonous substance, especially one produced by bacteria, that causes disease


…and a poison is defined as:

a substance that can make people or animals ill or kill them if they eat or drink it


Obviously eating or drinking are not the only ways to get a toxin/poison into a person, but we can see that any part of what is injected, be that adjuvants, stabilisers or the active mRNA, if it makes a person ill or kills them, is a toxin. This deliberate limiting of what is a “toxin” in the UN response is downright dishonest. The mRNA in these injections does not exist in nature, is not naturally occurring in food or the human body, so they are clearly excluding it from even being considered a trace toxin that is harmless in small amounts.


COVID-19 vaccine do not cause COVID-19 infection. Vaccines teach our immune systems how to recognize and fight the virus that causes COVID-19. Sometimes this process can cause symptoms, such as fever. Typical side effects include pain at the injection site, fever, fatigue, headache, muscle pain, chills, and diarrhea. These symptoms are normal and are signs that the body is building protection against the virus that causes COVID-19. It typically takes a few weeks for the body to build immunity (protection against the virus that causes COVID-19) after vaccination. That means it’s possible a person could be infected with the virus that causes COVID-19 just before or just after vaccination and still get sick. This is because the vaccine has not had enough time to provide protection. If symptoms are persistent and prolonged, they should not be attributed to COVID-19 vaccine side effects and testing for COVID-19 should occur. (Source: CDC: Myths and Facts about COVID-19 Vaccines) For more information: WHO: Side Effects of COVID-19 Vaccines

There may be people out there that made this claim, but I am not aware of anyone making the very specific claim that “COVID-19 vaccines can give you COVID-19”. What people are saying is that these injections harm your body and reduce it’s ability to fight off disease generally as this kind of trauma to your immune system was expected to do. Artificially inducing an auto-immune condition where your own body is producing the pathogen was always going to be ultimately detrimental, and depending on where the mRNA ended up and which cells were being programmed to create the “spike protein” has a large bearing on if people are barely affected or very badly affected. The depleted immune system making them more susceptible to getting ill, which then is diagnosed as COVID-19 with the fraudulent tests was also a predicted outcome and is exactly what is happening.

So no, the COVID-19 vaccines don’t give you COVID-19, not just because the vaccines don’t contain the virus alleged to cause it, but because that’s not what ANYONE was actually ill with anyway, and not what they subsequently got ill with.


The WHO Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (WHO GACVS) has found that the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine (Vaxzevria and Covishield) is effective at preventing serious side effects of COVID-19 infection that can cause hospitalization and death. The most common side effects from the vaccine are mild to moderate that usually resolve in a few days. The most serious side effects are very rare but can cause blood clots with low platelets. Recent data from the UK suggests the risk these serious sides effects is approximately four cases per million adults (1 case per 250 000) who receive the vaccine.
The WHO GACVS has also stated that the benefits of vaccination are far greater than the risk of the rare side effect. In addition to the benefits in preventing severe disease and death due to COVID-19, the vaccine offers protection against overall COVID-19 and complications from ‘long COVID’ and death, potential protection for close contacts and the community by preventing transmission, and a risk reduction of severe disease from some variant strains of the virus. (Source: WHO Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS) and Interim statement of the COVID-19 subcommittee of the WHO Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety on AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine). For more information on the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine, see the vaccine Fact Sheet.

The BBC had reported a month earlier that “Denmark stops rollout completely” of the AstraZeneca vaccine. The UN quotes the UK MHRA who we previously established are totally compromised. The claim that the AZ jab prevents “serious side effects of COVID-19 infection” (which is an interesting phrase) is totally unsubstantiated. The claim about “preventing transmission” is also an outright lie, as we have noted previously that the notion of prevention has been totally abandoned and people are now acting like it was never said. But it was, including repeatedly in this document.


WHO has stated that if you are trying to become pregnant now or want to get pregnant in the future, you may get a COVID-19 vaccine when one is available to you. There is currently no evidence that COVID-19 vaccination causes any problems with pregnancy, including the development of the placenta. In addition, there is no evidence that fertility problems are a side effect of any vaccine, including COVID-19 vaccines. Like all vaccines, scientists are studying COVID-19 vaccines carefully for side effects now and will continue to study them for many years. (Source: WHO: Vaccines Safety) Of course, you should always consult your own doctor when making these decisions.

Ah yes, the old “there is no evidence that…” chestnut. Well there was, and there is. Looking at the report titled “COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report – Week 40” on the UK Government website (PDF mirror), on page 25 it is quite clear there is a decline in live births in 2022 compared with 2021. It is important to compare the same month in each year, e.g. May with May, as birth rates are seasonal. Comparing UK births from 2021 to 2022 so far, they look like this…

Source Data: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1109618/vaccine-surveillance-report-week-40.pdf

The UK is not the only place to be seeing these kinds of declines. Sweden, Germany and many other countries are seeing plummeting birth rates, with barely a murmur from the media. As always, correlation is not proof of causation, but it is an indicator that something is very wrong. The fact you can’t find anything in the mainstream even acknowledging this drop in fertility is telling in and of itself.


No. See this: REUTERS; BBC; Business Insider; EU External Action Service

Again, no sane person ever claimed this. Of course this is the one that the BBC and the Fact Checker Brigade weigh in most heavily on. Because it takes the might of State media and multinational corporate fact checking services to prove that these…

…can’t fit through these…

Gosh, thanks UN, BBC and Fact Checkers™, however would we manage without you?

No more needs to be said about this ridiculous fake claim.


WHO has stated that like any vaccine, COVID-19 vaccines can cause mild side effects, such as a low-grade fever or pain or redness at the injection site. [Most reactions to vaccines are mild and go away within a few days on their own. More serious or long-lasting side effects to vaccines are possible but rare]. Vaccine side effects are continually monitored by local authorities to detect rare adverse events. Reported side effects to COVID-19 vaccines have mostly been mild to moderate and short-lasting. They include fever, fatigue, headache, muscle pain, chills, diarrhea, and pain at the injection site. The chances of any of these side effects following vaccination differ according to the specific COVID-19 vaccine. (See more information published by the World Health Organization: Vaccine Safety Q&A).

Again this response does nothing to actually address what they call a “myth” other than to dismiss concerns with the usual toolset, i.e. “any vaccine can cause mild side effects” followed by “serious side effects are rare”. That is the entirety of their argument, as if that does anything to address the deaths and permanent harms caused so far.

The problems here are many. First, the whole “do no harm” ethic that is fundamental to the medical profession has been abandoned, as you can now justify any amount of harm as long as you claim it’s offset by some benefit. In this case, there is no benefit. The efficacy claims are all bogus and the figures spewed by media boasting of tens of millions of lives saved are all complete fiction. Secondly, the claims that they monitor these things is only partly true. Pharmacovigilance systems like VAERS in the US and the Yellow Card System in the UK have thousands of reports about adverse reactions to the COVID-19 “vaccines”. Only the CDC, the FDA and the MHRA just ignore them.

The media just continues to push out lies such as this article from the Associated Press on the 24th September 2022 titled “Posts continue to misrepresent VAERS COVID-19 vaccine data”. They claim that it is “misleading” to reference the VAERS data because these reports are “not verified”. Right, not verified means it has not been proven either way, but it is an indicator something is up, and the point of these systems is to flag issues that are correlated to prompt further investigation. Except that isn’t happening. The AP article quotes a “Dr” from Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health…

“This number provides very little information upon which to base conclusions about the safety of the vaccine,” said Dr. Caleb Alexander, a professor of epidemiology and medicine at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, when asked in January about a similarly misleading claim that 1 million adverse events caused by the COVID-19 vaccines had been reported to VAERS. “We actually know from much better sources of data that the vaccines are incredibly safe.”


No doubt you’ll be unsurprised to see that there is not a single reference, link or anything regarding the “much better sources of data” that Caleb mentions. Because there’s nothing like fact-checking by dismissing actual evidence out of hand, and then just quoting someone making a baseless claim with zero evidence.


While several COVID-19 vaccines appear to have high levels of efficacy, no vaccine is 100% protective. As a result, there may be a small percentage of people who do not develop protection after COVID-19 vaccination. In addition to a vaccine’s specific characteristics, several factors such as a person’s age, their underlying health conditions or previous exposure to COVID-19 may have an impact on a vaccine’s effectiveness. It is also not yet known how long immunity from different COVID-19 vaccines will last. That is one reason why, even after vaccination, we must continue using all public health measures that work, such as physical distancing, masks, and handwashing.

So here’s the thing. That “several COVID-19 vaccines appear to have high levels of efficacy” is all it was, an appearance. This was achieved by manipulating the public’s perception of what constituted a reduction in risk. The mechanism at work was presenting relative risk reduction instead of absolute risk reduction on top of rigged and fraudulent trials. We looked before in detail as to how this works and the figures that Pfizer and Moderna engineered with this method.

Pfizer reported an efficacy figure of 95% and the Governments and media screeched it out for them. That was the relative risk reduction. The absolute risk reduction was 0.7% and the idea that this could even be considered legal in terms of advertising standards let alone ethical is staggering. Moderna pushed their 94% figure and the Governments and media did the same hyperventilating promo job for them, and yet the absolute risk reduction was 1.1%.

Factor in that those numbers, the 0.7% and 1.1% were based on questionable data, diagnosing COVID-19 in trial participants with vague symptom lists and PCR tests that cannot identify a virus or whether someone is ill, infectious or otherwise, and there is simply no way anyone could have made a legitimate case these vaccines “worked”. As time went by and that became painfully obvious, the party line switched seamlessly from “it prevents COVID” to “it might stop some symptoms”.

The evidence that the UN, WHO et al knew this is there at the end of the paragraph…

It is also not yet known how long immunity from different COVID-19 vaccines will last. That is one reason why, even after vaccination, we must continue using all public health measures that work, such as physical distancing, masks, and handwashing.

After taking these so-called vaccines, that are so “highly effective”, keep on doing all the things that people were told would end once they’d dutifully taken their injections. Of course none of those things stop people getting unwell either, but they had got the public in such a state that they would accept anything a politician promised them to get even a semblance of “normal life” back. Someone even said to me “They can inject me with whatever they like as long as I can get back to watching live football and going to the pub”.

People who were at no risk from a respiratory illness, whatever it is, ended up taking these injections based on lies. There was no informed consent. No-one was told about the actual risk reduction. No-one was told about the potential harms these injections were known to cause because it’s all in the Pfizer trial data that was submitted and led to its Emergency Use Authorisation, that was going to be hidden away for 75 years. We’ve seen some of it now, and the list of over 1,000 different illnesses, ailments and damage in one of those documents listed as “ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST” shows they knew these things were not safe and effective.


Vaccination protects you from getting seriously ill and dying from COVID-19. For the first fourteen days after getting a vaccination, you do not have significant levels of protection. For a single dose vaccine, immunity will generally occur two weeks after vaccination. For two-dose vaccines, both doses are needed to achieve are required to provide the highest level of best immunity possible. While a COVID-19 vaccine will protect you from serious illness and death, the extent to which it keeps you from being infected and passing the virus on to others is unknown although preliminary data suggests there are protective effects. To help keep others safe, continue to maintain at least a 1-2 meter distance from others, cover a cough or sneeze in your elbow, clean your hands frequently and wear a mask, particularly in enclosed, crowded or poorly ventilated spaces. Always follow guidance from local authorities based on the situation and risk where you live. (Source: WHO Information on COVID-19 Vaccines)

Obviously the very first statement is a lie, if we accept COVID-19 as being the cause of death for all the people that took these injections and died anyway. Obviously COVID-19 is not the actual cause of death, it never was. The rebranded version of what the public previously knew as “the ‘flu” and/or “the common cold” is what people got ill with, and still is. Only their immune systems have taken a beating from all the injections they took in good faith, and now things are worse. On top of that is all the other damage these injections are causing, as indicated by the unexplained (by official sources) increase in all-cause mortality.

We’ve rather painstakingly gone through all twelve “myths”, and it turns out that for each myth listed they either didn’t address the thing being presented as a myth, or lied, or both.

The UN has set itself up as the highest authority on Earth, and they are, like all those seeking exalted positions of authority, liars. This is not just a disagreement, or a viewpoint, a perception or alternative vantage point. There is now mountains of evidence to prove it, with more and more coming out and more and more people coming forward, whistleblowing and presenting the truth.

Stay strong, these control-freaks won’t just go away easily.