New Report: mRNA “Vaccine” Causes Encephalitis and Myocarditis
3 October 2022 - 1:43 pm
An early access version of a peer-reviewed case report originating from the Institute of Pathology in Dresden in Germany titled “A Case Report: Multifocal Necrotizing Encephalitis and Myocarditis after BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination against COVID-19” was published on the 1st October 2022 (PDF mirror).
Obviously I recommend you check out the full paper for yourself, but we’ll take a look at the abstract as published so we can establish what this is about, and what the findings were in a simplified form.
It starts off with the following…
The current report presents the case of a 76-year-old man with Parkinson’s disease (PD) who died three weeks after receiving his third COVID-19 vaccination. The patient was first vaccinated in May 2021 with the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vector vaccine, followed by two doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in July and December 2021. The family of the deceased requested an autopsy due to ambiguous clinical signs before death. PD was confirmed by post-mortem examinations. Furthermore, signs of aspiration pneumonia and systemic arteriosclerosis were evidenthttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/10/1651
OK, so this was not a young man, and he was unwell with Parkinson’s disease. He had three COVID-19 “vaccine” doses, the first was the AstraZeneca concoction, the second and third were the Pfizer mRNA type.
Before we go any further, as most people have forgotten that the AstraZeneca jab existed at all now, and the proven harms that caused have also disappeared from the mainstream discourse, we’ll briefly look at a tactic used often in pharmaceutical trials to demonstrate something is safe.
The trick is to use something else already approved, but has a questionable safety profile as the control in the randomised control trial (RCT). This was done with the AstraZeneca COVID-19 injection as shown in this study on The Lancet published in July 2020.
As you can see, in the section titled “Methods”, they describe…
We did a phase 1/2, single-blind, randomised controlled trial in five trial sites in the UK of a chimpanzee adenovirus-vectored vaccine (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) expressing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein compared with a meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenACWY) as control.https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31604-4/fulltext
So they are not comparing the AstraZeneca injection’s safety with saline or some other harmless substance, they are comparing it with a “meningococcal conjugate vaccine”. One of the excuses regularly parroted by the Pharma apparatchiks in Government and media is that “no medical intervention is without risk”, or in other words there is no medication that is completely safe for everyone, and that is true as we are all physiologically and genetically different. The point here is that by comparing a new medication with an existing one, any apparent safety indicator is not a reliable one, as it is making a comparison with something that likely already can cause harm. This may not be the identical vaccine used as a “control”, but MenACWY-D, a vaccine branded Menactra® manufactured by Sanofi Pasteur that has it’s own website illustrates this point. That website has a large “Important Safety Information” section that says…
Menactra is contraindicated in persons who have had a severe allergic reaction (eg, anaphylaxis) after a previous dose of a meningococcal capsular polysaccharide-, diphtheria toxoid-, or CRM197-containing vaccine, or to any component of the vaccine.https://www.menactra.com – Emphasis added.
Persons previously diagnosed with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) may be at increased risk of GBS following receipt of Menactra. GBS has been reported in temporal relationship following administration of Menactra.
So we have an admission that people can have reactions to any component of the vaccine, and that “Guillain-Barré syndrome” has been connected with Menactra®. According to it’s own website they used the same trick to evaluate the safety of this drug…
The immunogenicity and safety of Menactra were evaluated in a head-to-head, randomized, multicenter, active-controlled, non-inferiority US clinical trial vs Menomune.https://www.menactra.com/
Menomune is another Sanofi Pasteur drug that allegedly provides protection from “invasive meningococcal disease caused by Neisseria meningiditis serogroups A, C, Y, and W-135”. You can see how this works… once something gets approved, and we know just how corrupt the approval process is, you can rig your safety trials by simply demonstrating your new thing isn’t any worse than your old thing, and even that is subject to statistical abuse, bias and fraudulent trial practices.
Now that we have identified just one more trick in the almost endless array available to predatory pharmaceutical companies and their allies, back to the study mentioned at the start. The abstract continues…
However, histopathological analyses of the brain uncovered previously unsuspected findings, including acute vasculitis (predominantly lymphocytic) as well as multifocal necrotizing encephalitis of unknown etiology with pronounced inflammation including glial and lymphocytic reaction. In the heart, signs of chronic cardiomyopathy as well as mild acute lympho-histiocytic myocarditis and vasculitis were present. Although there was no history of COVID-19 for this patient, immunohistochemistry for SARS-CoV-2 antigens (spike and nucleocapsid proteins) was performed. Surprisingly, only spike protein but no nucleocapsid protein could be detected within the foci of inflammation in both the brain and the heart, particularly in the endothelial cells of small blood vessels. Since no nucleocapsid protein could be detected, the presence of spike protein must be ascribed to vaccination rather than to viral infection. The findings corroborate previous reports of encephalitis and myocarditis caused by gene-based COVID-19 vaccines.
So, he ended up with vasculitis, multifocal necrotizing encephalitis, cardiomyopathy and lympho-histiocytic myocarditis affecting his brain and heart. When they analysed the affected areas of the brain and heart, only the spike protein allegedly from the SARS-CoV-2 “virus” itself was found, “particularly in the endothelial cells of small blood vessels”, no other components, and therefore there is no way this could be attributed to COVID-19. The only way this “spike protein” ended up in this unfortunate man who was probably told that due to his age and PD diagnosis he absolutely should have his COVID-19 jabs, was via those jabs as they contain the genetic instructions to make one’s own cells create it.
Vasculitis is an auto-immune disease. According to the Arthritis Foundation website…
Vasculitis occurs when the immune system mistakenly sees blood vessels as a foreign invader and attacks them. What causes this to happen isn’t fully understood.https://www.arthritis.org/diseases/vasculitis
Hmmm, “isn’t fully understood”. We are supposed to believe that these criminal pharmaceutical companies, Bill Gates et al, stooges in Government and Public Health Officials have settled the science on injecting people with substances that alter your cells behaviours, instructing them to produce pathogens that your own immune system then responds to, but they don’t fully understand how auto-immune diseases are caused. Of course auto-immune diseases existed before the introduction of mRNA injections in December 2020, but auto-immune diseases have become more common over the last 100 years. It is hard to say specifically how much more common as they don’t bother tracking these things as admitted on the Johns Hopkins University website. To quote…
How common are autoimmune diseases? We do not know exactly. There is no mechanism in place, in fact, to systematically collect data about the prevalence and incidence of autoimmune diseases (as it exists for infectious diseases and cancers). In addition, since we do not have a complete and universally acceptable list of autoimmune diseases, it is difficult to collect data about something that is not clearly defined.https://pathology.jhu.edu/autoimmune/prevalence/
It seems obvious why there is “no mechanism in place”. If it turned out that the main cause for auto-immune disease was people (including children) getting their immune systems abused by injection after injection, that particular gravy train and form of control as it has become, would evaporate. What better way to ensure no-one ever establishes a “temporal relationship” to use their phrasing, which might then lead to more in-depth research, than to just not bother looking at any of it.
That has been the problem up to now with the COVID jabs. These mechanisms of harm were known very early on. The findings of this case study are shocking, but not a shock to anyone who has been paying attention since before a single person had this stuff injected into them. Only now are we starting to see more people actually look for the evidence that was there all along.
The phrasing is everything. We have repeatedly heard “there is no evidence that…”, and that has been entirely down to those tasked and paid to look for evidence, looking the other way. There are hundreds if not thousands of other studies now on major publishing sites that prove most of the things that honest doctors, scientists and researchers were saying from the start.