We live in a corrupted system. The way to tackle corruption is to first acknowledge it exists. Only then is it possible to come up with ways of dealing with it, but don't make the mistake of believing the system can or will uncorrupt itself.

The Ministry of Truth In Action

All the big tech companies have been extremely heavy-handed when it comes to “debunking” and removing non-State Authorised ideas about COVID-19. This has been a coordinated effort at the behest of Governments, both national and international flavours, to censor any ideas that go against the current narrative. As that narrative has adapted when the sheer weight of evidence against aspects of the State-sponsored fictional pandemic becomes to much to ignore, the various “fact-checkers”, social media giants and mainstream media change their story without even pausing for breath.

Oceania was at war with Eastasia: Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia. A large part of the political literature of five years was now completely obsolete. Reports and records of all kinds, newspapers, books, pamphlets, films, sound-tracks, photographs—all had to be rectified at lightning speed. Although no directive was ever issued, it was known that the chiefs of the Department intended that within one week no reference to the war with Eurasia, or the alliance with Eastasia, should remain in existence anywhere.

1984 by George Orwell – Page 230 – https://www.planetebook.com/free-ebooks/1984.pdf

The above excerpt from the book 1984 illustrates how the switch from one clear, unambiguous standpoint to the complete opposite almost overnight was intended to work. The Ministry of Truth had their work cut out for them as they needed to essentially rewrite history to ensure it matched up with the current belief. What was being said right now, was supposed to have always been so, even if it had literally just changed. The public was supposed to accept the new, completely opposite version of “truth” and also accept that it had always been that way.

We have had that with the recent claims by Dominic Cummings that the Government was all for “herd-immunity” which of course is alleged to be a Very Bad Idea. The Government is now denying they ever held that position, but they did. People will remember the talk of “herd-immunity” which is why “flattening the curve” as an idea existed in the first place. Now though, we are expected by the Government to pretend they never said that, and that Cummings is a total liar. Change “Eastasia” to lockdowns/vaccines, and “Eurasia” to herd-immunity and you’re almost there with Winston Smith toiling away at Minitrue.

Cummings is a liar of course. He cannot be trusted for one second and this sudden exposé and urge to unmask Boris and Hancock as incompetent is not about a pang of conscience and a desire to tell the truth. This is more distraction, and setting up yet another false dichotomy, that being the choice was between lockdowns, or stricter, sooner lockdowns. This is to seed into the public consciousness that there were no other choices and this “pandemic” is so bad that even our current tyrannical Government just wasn’t tyrannical enough. A fake choice for a fake pandemic.

Fake choices AKA false dichotomies are a tool used by tyrants the world over, and have been deployed for thousands of years. The choice of only two options, neither of which are good, founded in reality or most importantly constitute the actual full array of available choices is how this works. Red or Blue, Left or Right, Labour or Conservative, Democrat or Republican, Lockdowns or earlier Lockdowns… this is how it works. None of those selections represent the reality of actual choices, but they are all that is presented, and you must pick one. According to them.

We’re now seeing another one of those unfold. Facebook has literally done a 180 on being able to post about the claim that COVID-19 was man-made, possibly in a lab. Only a few months ago, on the 8th February 2021 they posted an update (screenshot) entitled “Removing More False Claims About COVID-19 and Vaccines” and stated the following:

Today, we are expanding our efforts to remove false claims on Facebook and Instagram about COVID-19, COVID-19 vaccines and vaccines in general during the pandemic. Since December, we’ve removed false claims about COVID-19 vaccines that have been debunked by public health experts. Today, following consultations with leading health organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO), we are expanding the list of false claims we will remove to include additional debunked claims about the coronavirus and vaccines. This includes claims such as:

– COVID-19 is man-made or manufactured
– Vaccines are not effective at preventing the disease they are meant to protect against
– It’s safer to get the disease than to get the vaccine
– Vaccines are toxic, dangerous or cause autism

The full list of claims is available here, and we already prohibit these claims in ads. These new policies will help us continue to take aggressive action against misinformation about COVID-19 and vaccines.


So back in February the idea that “COVID-19 is man-made or manufactured” was on a list of “debunked claims” and if you posted anything to that effect Facebook would take “aggressive action” against you.

Fast-forward to today (27th May 2021) and we have the Independent (amongst many others) reporting that “Facebook is removing its ban on posts calling the novel coronavirus man-made” (screenshot).

This does highlight one obvious point, which is allowing the social media tech giants to be the arbiters of truth and be assigned the role of regulating what can and can’t be discussed is clearly ridiculous, as we’ve gone from “you’re not allowed to say that, it’s been debunked” to “okay you can say that” in just a few months. Has anything changed? Is there any evidence to say it is man-made, or it did come from a lab? No, of course not. The alleged “debunking” which was really nothing of the sort, hasn’t now been “debunked”. It can’t be because the original “debunking” was just statements like “it didn’t come from a lab” backed up with “because we say so” along with “and we’ll censor you if you say it”. You can’t debunk non-evidenced statements and decrees to silence free speech. It should be clear to anyone who hasn’t been lobotomised by relentless propaganda yet that this is utterly ridiculous and makes a mockery of the so-called fact-checkers and corporate debunk-squads.

But there is another issue. This is now presenting another false dichotomy to the world. We’re now being presented with the fake choice, lovingly gift-wrapped in the guise of truth, that either:

  1. The virus naturally jumped species and has ripped through the world’s population pandemic-style
  2. The virus was created in a lab, got out somehow and has ripped through the world’s population pandemic-style

The problem is, neither of those are true but we’re now going to be treated to a lengthy circus show of an argument, to divide people further and get them arguing about which of those two false choices they believe is true. The Governments will drip-feed snippets strategically to keep it going, and the mainstream media will stoke the fires at every opportunity.

We are presented with false choices all the time by people who have a vested interest in controlling the outcome. Whether it is a choice of who gets to sit in Number 10 and be the temporary figurehead of the ruling class, or which version of the COVID lie you’d like to believe, the other non-presented, but always there option is “none of the above”. In most cases, “none of the above” is the ideal default choice, but being aware of how the false dichotomy scam works does remove much of it’s influence.

Government’s worst nightmare is people ignoring them and going about their lives, managing their own affairs and getting along. Not because it’s bad, or that it can’t happen, but because it demonstrably shows the Government they are irrelevant and humanity can manage fine without psychopathic control freaks dictating every miniscule aspect of our lives.

We can meet control freaks and narcissists in our daily lives at a personal level, and the way to deal with them is to ignore them, and cut them and their influences out of your life. At that point they will get upset, and often try to engineer ways to inveigle or coerce their way back into your life. Resisting that, and refusing to allow them back in is what every sensible person realises is how to deal with it, even if that is difficult, which it can be. Counsellors and therapists will recommend that to people who have been unfortunate enough to have a controlling or narcissistic person in their life.

The Government is the ultimate controlling narcissist that claims you cannot manage without it. You desperately need State guidance because without them you’re nothing, and incapable of performing the basics to survive. This is Narcissistic Control-Freakism 101. We really can survive, and actually thrive, without the malignant cancer that is Government and we can just reject it all.