COVID-19 Vaccines Reduce Risk?
25 June 2022 - 12:23 pm
Forget the original sales pitch which was to have your COVID-19 injectable products, shut up and you’ll never get COVID-19, won’t die from it and won’t pass it on. We’re way past that, so please pretend ‘they’ never said any of those things. We’ve also moved past the stage of it will at least stop COVID from being a serious illness, and you probably won’t die from it.
We’re now at the stage where most people are in denial about what they originally believed, and probably couldn’t articulate their current belief about the so-called vaccines because it’s impossible to do so when your belief is founded on completely contradictory positions and conflicting data. That’s where we are now, denial, mass cognitive dissonance and mega-coping.
Some people might still manage the general party line which is that they reduce your risk from serious health complications, or words to that effect. In other words, they (the vaccines) HAVE failed all the claims made initially which were the claims that convinced a vast proportion of people to take these (now proven) DNA altering, blood-clot causing, prion disease triggering, cancer awakening genetic products in the first place. But never mind that, IF you catch the COVIDS after having these jabs, your chances of all the health issues claimed to be caused by the COVIDS (which by now is an almost infinite list of every ailment known to humans) is supposed to be reduced by more than your chances of suffering what are claimed to be “extremely rare” adverse reactions to said jabs.
Just a bit of additional information regarding the claim that those adverse reactions are “extremely rare”, the UK Yellow Card system that is the reporting and monitoring system for such things, as of the 8th June 2022 shows:
458,003 total adverse event reports
1,498,991 total adverse reactions
In the U.S. their VAERS system which is their equivalent to the UK Yellow Card system is reporting these numbers:
810,618 total adverse event report ids
14,842 permanent disabilities
The under-reporting factor as we have previously discussed averages at 41, but can range from anything from 2-100. This means those figures are definitely lower than the actual numbers for all of those things, so even taking into account the fact that not all of those reported adverse events are necessarily caused by the injected product, the numbers are way higher and to simply dismiss them is not scientific. It’s also not the designed process based on indicators from pharmacovigilance tools like Yellow Card and VAERS that are designed to flag up such things that did not show themselves in limited trials. Obviously it turns out that many of these indicators DID show themselves in the limited trials, but they hid them, ignored them and lied about them to get these injectable products approved and forced on an unsuspecting public that trusted the institutions and regulators tasked with protecting them from this very thing.
For example, a study that is in pre-print right now, currently undergoing peer-review clearly demonstrates that from the Pfizer and Moderna trial data it was clear that the risk of serious adverse events from COVID injections is greater than the risk of COVID hospitalisation relative to the placebo group. Here is a link to the pre-print version of the study on SSRN.com and a copy of the PDF in case it mysteriously vanishes.
From the abstract of the paper…
Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events of special interest, with an absolute risk increase of 10.1 and 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo baselines of 17.6 and 42.2 (95% CI -0.4 to 20.6 and -3.6 to 33.8), respectively. Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an absolute risk increase of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 (95% CI 2.1 to 22.9). The excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest surpassed the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group in both Pfizer and Moderna trials (2.3 and 6.4 per 10,000 participants, respectively)Page 2 – https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4125239
Obviously people are getting hospitalised with respiratory ailments, just like they have done for as long as hospitals have existed. For the last 27 months those respiratory ailments have mostly been rebranded as COVID-19 as part of the psychological operation to convince the world that there is a new, deadly, contagious virus and everyone needs to listen to Mummy and Daddy Government, and get injected when you are told to. Whatever people were getting ill with before COVID was invented, and whatever they are getting ill with now, it is clear that both Pfizer and Moderna knew that the risks for serious adverse reactions to their genetic products were higher than what we are told is COVID-19.
There is just NO WAY these products should ever have been approved or given to a single human being. Not even the claimed justification now relied upon after all the original claims have proven to be false, is actually true or constitutes justification. Just as honest, educated and intelligent professionals and researchers said before a single member of the public got this stuff put in them, the “cure” is worse than the alleged disease.
There SHOULD be court cases everywhere, suing the manufacturers, Governments, Public and Global Health organisations, and people who administered these harmful products to the public under known false pretences, but because pretty much everything including the legal system is so incredibly corrupt and stacked in favour of the groups at fault, the likelihood this will happen is low, especially with a public that is largely still unaware of the monumental crime and fraud that has, and is continuing to be perpetrated against them.
Let’s hope some day that enough people realise what has happened, and in enough numbers force the issue and hold these people to account.