COVID-19: The Most Inclusive Illness
6 April 2022 - 11:42 am
Not only is COVID-19 the most contagious disease ever despite millions of people not getting it, including the mysterious cases of one household member “testing positive” and the others not, it is one of the most inclusive. It has embraced all kinds of people, including those not actually ill. By means of this inclusive process the phrase “not ill” has been replaced with “asymptomatic”.
COVID-19 “doesn’t discriminate” we were told repeatedly even though the average age of serious symptomatic illness leading to death “within 28 days of a positive test” was higher than the average age of death in the UK and many others, which sounds rather like some kind of age-based discrimination.
If you recall we wrote about the ridiculous list of COVID-19 symptoms before when the Sun published a list of the “Top 20 Omicron Symptoms” back in January 2022. That list was the following:
- runny nose
- sore throat
- persistent cough
- hoarse voice
- chills or shivers
- brain fog
- altered smell
- eye soreness
- unusual muscle pains
- skipped meals
- loss of smell
- chest pain
- swollen glands
- feeling down
Clearly that list is a hypochondriac’s dream, as a huge proportion of people will likely experience something from that absurd list more often than not. But apparently we have now have 9 “new symptoms” added to the list, as reported by the BBC on the 4th April 2022. These new symptoms are:
- shortness of breath
- feeling tired or exhausted
- aching body
- sore throat
- blocked or runny nose
- loss of appetite
- feeling sick or being sick
Now I’m not a doctor, epidemiologist, virologist, Public Health Expert or a member of any of the accredited guilds permitted to speak on such matters, but this “new” set of symptoms seems uncannily similar to the ancient list from way back in January 2022. Only the addition of diarrhoea and feeling/being sick was not on the Sun’s list, and even so people would often assume they had COVID and rush out to do a “test” if they had an upset stomach. But who am I to question this “Science”? After all, the BBC article quotes an Expert, Professor Tim Spector from King’s College London no less…
Prof Tim Spector, from King’s College London, has been campaigning for an expanded list of symptoms because of data from people tracking their symptoms in the Zoe Covid-19 app.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-60982070.amp
He said: “Main symptoms of coronavirus have finally changed after two years of lobbying… hurrah.”
The “Zoe Covid-19 app” let’s remember, is a self-reporting “case” and symptom tracker that was funded by at least £2,000,000 of public money. It is obviously biased in favour of those that believe most zealously in the COVID doctrine as only those kinds of people would bother with an app and self-report their illness daily. We’re talking about the perpetually afraid, who disinfect their carrier bags and probably still wear masks when walking down the street on their own. This is not to mock those people however, this is to demonstrate just how evil the Governments have been with their deliberate fear campaigns and how frightened some people were, and still are.
All that being said, this Zoe Covid-19 app is hardly science. It is anecdotal, allegedly anonymised data coming from people who have been made so afraid they think reporting things like diarrhoea and feeling tired is somehow helping others. Say to one of these people, or policy makers in Government, that masks and lockdowns didn’t help as proven by Sweden who enforced neither and had near identical outcomes per capita, even going by the same fraudulent tests and nonsense diagnoses and they’ll smugly inform you “that’s anecdotal” and dismiss it out of hand. But Professor Spector exclaims “hurrah” when a bunch of symptoms that could be part of almost any illness that exists gets added to the “main symptoms” list for coronavirus after “two years of lobbying”.
State Science is an embarrassment to those who conduct or care about actual science.
Nothing about any of the COVID dogma is scientific. It was already well known and evidenced that lockdowns and masks did not help, and would only cause harm when forced on the public en masse. The isolation from lockdowns killed thousands by various means and has psychologically damaged old and young, probably irreparably, yet only lockdown devotees who have written articles and papers claiming they were a success tend to get any public traction. This embarrassment of an article on the Forbes website from February 2022 illustrates the mainstream academia zealotry for lockdowns and the refusal to admit they were wrong. The juvenile language, false equivalencies and so on, amongst a smattering of legitimate points about a so-called “Johns Hopkins” paper that is in fact a “working paper” by “Herby, Jonung, and Hanke” are to detract from any valid points this paper might be making. I am making no claims about the “working paper”, unlike the Forbes author who accuses it and it’s authors of being ineligible to write on the topic based on their skill-sets, calls them selective and then himself cherry-picks some tweets that disagree. You can find the paper here, it clearly makes no secret that it is the work of economists, as it has “Studies in Applied Economics” emblazoned across page one. Hardly misrepresenting their chief discipline.
What lockdown and mask fans miss, is that all the money “spaffed” on lockdowns and associated costs for furlough, grants and wasteful Test & Trace nonsense, all to “protect the NHS” from the very people that pay for it, could have been better spent on more hospitals and training staff, something that for many years has been complained about, including in the mainstream media. Oh wait, they kind of did that with the nightingale hospitals that were barely used and then quietly dismantled, and the hundreds of millions spent on booking private hospital beds that were never used. See here for some perspective on what was wasted.
Now though, while most people are deciding who to support, either Team Ukraine or Team Russia, Team Smith or Team Rock etc. things are being drip-fed out. The BBC reported on the 5th April 2022 in an article titled “Covid: Young child development worrying, says Ofsted boss” that:
nurseries flagged babies with “limited vocabularies” and struggling to understand facial expressions.https://www.bbc.com/news/education-60981450
Well what a surprise. Two years and counting of babies coming into a world where adults are all wearing ridiculous, ineffective pieces of cloth over their faces has impacted social interaction, speech and the ability to understand facial expressions. This is horrible, but not unexpected at all. Anyone with a working brain knew this would be the result. The Government and all it’s scientific advisors, psychologists and behavioural analysts knew this would be the result. You would have to be completely stupid to not know this would be the result, but here we are. We are faced with two options…
- The people in charge are stupid and should never be allowed to dictate policy and law ever again
- The people in charge are evil, knowingly forcing psychologically damaging and worthless laws affecting the most vulnerable people in society, children.