We live in a corrupted system. The way to tackle corruption is to first acknowledge it exists. Only then is it possible to come up with ways of dealing with it, but don't make the mistake of believing the system can or will uncorrupt itself.

The FDA and the “Full Transparency” Illusion

30 November 2021 - 1:14 pm

The FDA, which is for those unaware is the United States Food and Drug Administration, the Government regulatory body who’s single job is to check and test claims about food and drugs by their manufacturers and ensure they are safe, effective if that is relevant and that the claims are evidenced.

In November 2020 the FDA released a statement announcing a meeting to discuss what was at the time a “second COVID-19 vaccine candidate”, where they started out with this…

“In keeping with the FDA’s commitment to ensuring full transparency, dialogue and efficiency…”

Yes, that is a “commitment” to “full transparency”. Let’s bear that in mind when looking at a federal ruling on a Freedom of Information lawsuit filed by a nonprofit group of public health professionals, medical professionals, scientists and actual journalists called “Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency” (PHMPT) (website).

As you can see on their website, four days after the Pfizer vaccine was approved by the FDA for ages 16+, this group had submitted a Freedom of Information Act Request for all the data within Pfizer’s COVID-19 “vaccine” biological product file.

As part of the FDA’s “commitment” to “full transparency” they did not release the requested information.

On 22nd September 2021 the FDA released another statement regarding the FDA approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech “booster” and reaffirmed their “commitment to transparency”.

A few days before that reaffirmation of their “commitment to transparency”, the PHMPT sued the FDA and on their website you can access the related court documents and documents from Pfizer.

On the 15th November 2021 the FDA asked the federal judge in this FOIA case to allow them a schedule to “search for, process, and produce records” related to this request, which they claim amounts to “more than 329,000 pages” and also spreadsheets containing “thousands of rows of data”. The schedule they are requesting (as described in this court document) is as follows…

November 17:

o From Section 5.2 of the Biologics License Application (“BLA”) file:
▪ The Tabular Listing
▪ The Listing of Clinical Sites
o The Reports of Postmarketing Experience from Section 5.3.6 of the BLA file
o One SAS file.

December 1:

Remainder of section 5.2 of the BLA file.

After the December 1 production, FDA proposes to work through the list of documents that Plaintiff requested FDA prioritize for production in order of priority and process and release the non-exempt portions of those records to Plaintiff on a rolling basis. FDA proposes to process and produce the non-exempt portions of responsive records at a rate of 500 pages per month.

Pages 3 and 4 – https://www.sirillp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/020-Second-Joint-Status-Report-8989f1fed17e2d919391d8df1978006e.pdf

This means at the rate of 500 pages per month the release of these documents would not be completed for 55 years, ending in 2076.

We are expected to believe that in 108 days starting on the 7th May 2021 when Pfizer began submitting information and data to get the FDA to license their product, to the 23rd August 2021 when the FDA granted that license, they conducted an intense, robust, thorough and complete review of all those documents and all the related data, but they are now asking for over 20,000 days to make those documents public.

Given that Pfizer are shielded from any and all liability given to them by the US Government, have received billions of dollars and continues to do so from the US Government, now has the US Government mandating Pfizer’s product for the American public, and now are doing everything they can to stop the public from seeing the data that allegedly supports the product’s safety and efficacy, it should be obvious now who the FDA and the US Government is protecting. Not the public who’s money and labour is stolen from them to pay for those institutions under the guise of protecting them, but clearly and demonstrably the FDA and the US Government is there to protect the interests and finances of multinational corporate business. And why wouldn’t they? We know there is a revolving door between these Government regulatory bodies like the FDA and CDC and the companies they allegedly regulate, and a large proportion of the money coming in to these Authorities comes from the industries they pretend to regulate.

If anyone still believes these regulators are there to protect the public, and think that the full release of safety and efficacy data shouldn’t happen for over half a century, perhaps a re-evaluation of how you think “protecting the public” actually works is in order.

If you want to take an injection, or have a medical procedure then provided you have been properly informed and are freely making that decision, or you don’t care enough to be concerned about that aspect, as an adult that is entirely your choice. But medical mandates of any kind are wrong. History is littered with examples of how this ALWAYS ends up. All we need to do is say no in enough numbers and this finishes tomorrow.